🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.